New Law Limits Impound of Vehicles From Unlicensed Drivers

The measure, which took effect Jan. 1, changes the previous policy of impounding vehicles seized at DUI checkpoints.

Presione aquí para leer la nota en español

Baldwin Park resident Miguel Rios, whose car was impounded in the city's tow yard after police seized the vehicle for Rios driving without a license, smiles emphatically after hearing what might so far be the best news of the year.

According to legislative measure AB 353, which was signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown in October, police can no longer impound a vehicle solely because the driver is unlicensed. 

Under the new law, a driver stopped at a DUI checkpoint who is sober and unlicensed can call a licensed driver to take the vehicle instead of surrendering it to a tow yard for 30 days.

The measure, which took effect Jan. 1, changes the previous policy of impounding vehicles seized at DUI checkpoints from sober owners who could not produce a valid driver's license.

"I think it's quite fair, although they're going to keep the fines, but at least [police] won't take the vehicle," said Rios, a merchant who sells products in various Southern California cities.

Under California law, only residents with legal immigration status can obtain a driver's license.

"A person drives out of necessity. Maybe they should allow us to obtain a driver's license," Rios said.

Seizing vehicles for 30 days at DUI checkpoints became a controversial practice in California. Civil rights advocates claim some cities used the previous law to collect funds from undocumented residents instead of detaining drunk drivers.

Drivers without a license are charged impound fees in excess of $1,500. Motorists who don't pay the fees subject their vehicle to auction by the towing company.

An investigation conducted by the Center for Investigative Reporting's California Watch noted the impounding of vehicles at DUI checkpoints generated $40 million in penalties in 2009, which was distributed among the cities and towing companies.

Police officers received an estimated $30 million in overtime pay during these roundups.

In 2010, Baldwin Park police were strongly criticized for sobriety checkpoints that resulted in a greater number of vehicles seized from unlicensed drivers than in arrests of motorists driving under the influence.

Baldwin Park Policeto resemble the law that took effect Monday.

Ron Gochez, a spokesman for the Southern California Immigration Coalition, an organization that alerts drivers of checkpoints in the region, said the new law is a small step in the right direction but not enough to solve the problem.

"Cars will still be seized during routine stops," he said.

"If cities are worried about their safety, they should support a law that allows for issuance of licenses and let people take the DMV exam. That way, we are all safe," he said.

Supporters of vehicle seizures argue that unlicensed drivers are a danger on California roadways.

Escondido Police Chief Jim Maher recently told the Associated Press the new law is a step in the wrong direction.

"It's a terrible law, really disappointing," Maher said.

Michael Brown January 04, 2012 at 04:17 PM
Props to all of the grassroots community organizations that put in ground work to overturn this "law." Well, atleast to get portions of it modified. As was shown by the study cited in this story, these checkpoints and other archaic traffic ordinances are basically de facto taxes. They have nothing to do with keeping anyone safe. I'm glad the cops can't steal vehicles anymore at these checkpoints and hold them for ransom.
t mccullum January 11, 2013 at 06:03 PM
I'm glad to hear about this law, I had my licence suspended (not a DUI), but for expired registration and failue to appear (I was in the hospital)and after I paid the fine, went to court showed that I had been in the hospital etc etc, they judge sais "I can see you paid but I can't see where we received the money so you still need to pay more" I did not pay more I couldn't, so it took 8 years to get my licence back, not to mention one car impounded for the 30 days for which I could not afford to get it back, because I could not get my licence or pay the fine. So after 8 years on Jan 7th I got my licence back, a much better insurance rate, I can finnally drive without constant fear of getting stopped, I had to drive in order to get to work, but finally I am good to go.
Tammy tiner March 18, 2013 at 11:51 PM
Does this law pertain to city's ruins other than checkpoints. How about if the driver didn't have a license but he wasnt the registered owner. The police refuse to give me my truck back before the 30 days and they took my truck from my home. It wasnt even drivable cause it was wrecked. They didn't even contact me and I was in the house. My boyfriend was outside with them. The truck was totally legal insurance registration


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »